Pricing Strategy skill for Claude Code

Prices that scale with the value customers get. Claude starts from segments, unit costs, plan-level churn, and realized discounts instead of competitor price tags. It tests candidate value metrics, builds tiers with a named buyer each, checks gross margin for the heaviest users on AI or usage plans, backs price points with at least two willingness-to-pay methods, and pairs every change with a plan for existing customers.

  • namepricing-strategy
  • size212 lines · ≈2,750 tokens
  • files1
  • licenseMIT
  • updated

What Claude sees before loading it

This description is the only part of the skill that sits in context all the time. Claude reads it to decide when to load the full playbook below.

description: Designs and revises SaaS and subscription pricing and packaging, covering value metric selection, good-better-best tiers, feature fencing, willingness-to-pay research (Van Westendorp, Gabor-Granger, interviews), usage-based and hybrid models for AI products, free trial versus freemium, price increases and grandfathering, discount policy, and safe price testing. Use when setting launch pricing, restructuring plans, raising prices, adding usage or credit pricing, deciding on annual discounts, or when sales discounts are out of control.

Try asking

  • We charge $20 per seat but our AI features cost us a lot per heavy user. Redesign our pricing
  • Set launch pricing for our B2B analytics tool. We have 12 customer interviews and some competitor data
  • We want to raise prices 25% for existing customers. Plan the rollout and draft the announcement

Use it when

  • Setting pricing for a new product or plan
  • Restructuring tiers, limits, or the value metric
  • Adding usage-based, credit, or hybrid pricing for AI features
  • Planning a price increase or cleaning up sales discounting

Skip it when

How to check the result

Each tier has a named buyer and a modeled margin at p95 usage, and after rollout revenue per visitor, plan mix, and 90-day churn are compared against the pre-change cohort.

The common mistake it prevents

Running a simultaneous A/B test of different prices for the same plan invites fairness complaints and measures signups instead of revenue.

~/.claude/skills/pricing-strategy/SKILL.md

--- name: pricing-strategy description: Designs and revises SaaS and subscription pricing and packaging, covering value metric selection, good-better-best tiers, feature fencing,… license: MIT ---

Done well means the price scales with a metric customers recognize as value, each tier has a clear buyer and a reason to upgrade, the numbers come from willingness-to-pay evidence and unit economics rather than competitor copying, and every change ships with a rollout plan for existing customers and a measurement of what it did to conversion, expansion, and churn.

Ground rules

  • Packaging before price points. Wrong tiers at the right price still fail.
  • Price on value delivered, bounded below by cost to serve and checked against alternatives customers actually compare you with (including spreadsheets and doing nothing).
  • One recommended structure, not a menu of five. State the main risk and the fallback.
  • Never A/B test different prices for the same plan shown to similar visitors at the same time without the user deciding that consciously: it creates fairness complaints, support load, and in some jurisdictions consumer-protection exposure. Prefer the tests in step 6.
  • Price changes for existing customers, removed plans, and contract terms are business and legal decisions. Draft them, then get explicit user confirmation before anything is announced or changed in billing.

Workflow

- [ ] 1. Gather facts: segments, current plans, unit costs, conversion and churn by plan
- [ ] 2. Choose the value metric
- [ ] 3. Design packaging: tiers, fences, add-ons
- [ ] 4. Research willingness to pay
- [ ] 5. Set price points and the discount policy
- [ ] 6. Choose a test or rollout method
- [ ] 7. Plan the migration of existing customers
- [ ] 8. Write the pricing decision document and measurement plan

1. Facts first

Collect before proposing anything:

  • Segments: who buys (solo, team, mid-market, enterprise), how they buy (self-serve card, sales-assisted, procurement), and what each currently pays (ARPA by segment).
  • Funnel by plan: visitor to trial or free signup, trial to paid, free to paid, upgrade rate, logo churn and net revenue retention (NRR) by plan and cohort.
  • Unit economics: cost to serve per account and per unit of usage (infrastructure, model inference, support), current gross margin.
  • Discount reality: list price vs realized price across the last 50-100 deals.
  • Alternatives: the 3-5 products or workarounds prospects mention in sales calls and churn surveys, with their real prices.

2. Value metric

The value metric is the unit the price scales with. Test candidates against four questions:

TestGood signBad sign
Customers understand itThey can predict their billThey need a calculator and still get surprised
It grows with value receivedBigger outcomes mean more unitsHeavy users pay the same as light users
It is hard to gameSharing a login or batching does not cut the billOne seat shared by 10 people
It is cheap to measure and billAlready tracked reliablyNeeds new metering you do not trust

Common choices and where they fit:

MetricFitsWatch out for
Per seatCollaboration tools where each user gets valueDiscourages adoption; seat sharing
Per active userTools with uneven usage across a companyNeeds a clear “active” definition
Usage (API calls, messages, GB, minutes)Infrastructure, APIs, communicationsBill shock; forecasting for buyers
Outcomes (invoices processed, leads, resolutions)Clear, countable resultsDisputes over what counts
CreditsAI products with varied cost per actionOpaque value; needs a published credit table
Flat tiers with limitsSimple SMB productsLeaves expansion revenue on the table

Hybrid is the 2025-2026 default for AI-heavy products: a platform fee or seats for access plus included usage, then metered overage or credit packs. Check that the heaviest 5 percent of accounts stay above the target gross margin at the proposed price.

3. Packaging

Default to three self-serve tiers plus enterprise, each with a named buyer:

TierBuyerJob
EntryIndividual or small team proving valueLow-friction start; limited scale
Core (the target)The typical buying teamWhere most new revenue should land; visually recommended
AdvancedTeams needing control and scaleAdmin, permissions, integrations, higher limits
EnterpriseProcurement-led buyersSSO and SCIM, audit logs, data residency, SLAs, invoicing, custom terms

Fencing rules:

  • Fence on things that correlate with willingness to pay: scale (usage limits, seats), control (roles, audit, SSO), and business-critical integrations. Do not fence core value so hard that the entry tier cannot show what the product does.
  • Each tier should have 2-4 headline differences, not 30 checkmarks.
  • Put features only a minority needs, with real cost behind them, into add-ons.
  • Target mix after launch: roughly 50-70 percent of new paid accounts on the core tier. If most land on entry, the entry tier is too generous or the core tier too expensive.

Free trial vs freemium:

ChooseWhen
Free trial, 14 daysValue shows within a few sessions, self-serve product
Free trial, 30 days or sales-assisted pilotValue needs setup, data import, or team rollout
FreemiumLow marginal cost, network or viral effects, large market, clear upgrade triggers
Reverse trial (full features, then drop to free)You want freemium reach with trial urgency

Requiring a card at trial start typically cuts trial signups sharply but raises trial-to-paid conversion; decide on which number the funnel can afford to lose.

4. Willingness to pay

Use at least two methods; no single method is reliable alone.

MethodUse forMinimum sample
Customer interviews (value, alternatives, budget owner)Finding the value metric and fences10-15 per segment
Van Westendorp price sensitivity (four price questions)Acceptable price range for a defined package100+ responses per segment
Gabor-Granger (purchase likelihood at set prices)Demand curve around candidate points100+ per segment
Conjoint or MaxDiffWhich features drive tier choice200+, needs a survey tool that supports it
Win/loss and discount dataWhat buyers actually payLast 50+ deals

Describe the package concretely in surveys; asking “what would you pay for software that does X” without specifics produces noise. Survey answers skew low for consumers and sometimes high for B2B; treat them as ranges, not a point.

5. Price points and discounts

  • Set the core tier first, from WTP research and the value delivered (a common sanity check: price at 10-20 percent of the measurable value or cost saved for the customer).
  • Space tiers so each step is a meaningful jump, commonly 2-3x between adjacent tiers.
  • Self-serve SMB: charm endings ($49) are fine. Enterprise and procurement buyers: round numbers.
  • Annual billing discount: 15-20 percent (about two months free) is the norm; more than 25 percent trains customers to expect deep discounts.
  • Gross margin floor: 75-80 percent for classic SaaS; AI-heavy products often plan for 55-70 percent and must model inference cost per heavy user.

Discount policy (write it down, enforce it in the CRM):

DiscountWho approvesConditions
Up to 10 percentAccount executiveAnnual prepay or multi-year
10-20 percentSales managerVolume or competitive displacement, documented
Over 20 percentFinance or founderStrategic logo, written justification, expiry date

Trade every discount for something: longer term, upfront payment, case study, faster signature. Make discounts expire at renewal or step down over time, otherwise they become permanent.

6. Testing and rollout methods

MethodUse whenCaveat
New-customers-only change, before/afterMost self-serve changesControl for seasonality and marketing changes
Geographic or segment rolloutDistinct markets with separate pricing pagesLeakage via VPNs and word of mouth
Packaging test (feature placement, not price)Tier contents uncertainStill measure revenue per visitor, not just conversion
Sales-led price testQuoted dealsTrack win rate and sales cycle by price band
Simultaneous price A/BHuge traffic, consciously accepted risksFairness and legal risk; user must approve

Primary metric: revenue per visitor or per trial over a full sales cycle, not signup conversion alone. Guardrails: trial-to-paid, 90-day logo churn, refund rate, support tickets about pricing. Hand experiment mechanics (sample size, run length) to conversion-optimization.

7. Existing customers

  • Grandfather existing customers for a fixed period (commonly 6-12 months) or permanently on legacy plans; decide deliberately, permanent grandfathering accumulates billing complexity.
  • Give 30-90 days written notice for increases (check contract terms and local consumer law), explain what improved since they signed up, and offer annual lock-in at the old price.
  • Never remove a feature from a paying customer’s plan silently.
  • Expect some churn; model it. An increase is usually worth it if new_price x (1 - extra_churn) > old_price.

Gotchas

  • Copying a competitor’s price imports their cost structure and positioning, not yours.
  • Too many plans (more than four self-serve) slows decisions and raises support load.
  • Usage pricing without spend alerts, caps, or budgets produces bill shock and chargebacks.
  • Unlimited plans on AI products invite a few accounts to consume most of the inference budget.
  • Changing price, packaging, and the pricing page design at once makes the result unreadable.
  • Localized pricing needs purchasing-power and tax handling (VAT-inclusive display in the EU and UK for consumers); hand billing details to stripe-payments or merchant-of-record-billing.

Verification

  • Every tier has a named buyer, 2-4 headline differences, and a modeled gross margin at the heaviest 5 percent of usage.
  • The recommendation cites at least two WTP sources and the discount data.
  • After rollout, compare revenue per visitor or trial, plan mix, NRR, and 90-day churn against the pre-change cohort; if revenue per visitor falls more than the guardrail for 4 weeks, revert for new customers and revisit packaging.

Output template

## Pricing recommendation — <product> (YYYY-MM-DD)

**Value metric:** <metric>, because <evidence>
**Model:** <seats / usage / hybrid / credits>

| Tier | Buyer | Price (monthly / annual) | Headline differences | Limits | Margin at p95 usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|

**Trial / free:** <choice and reason>
**WTP evidence:** <methods, sample sizes, ranges found>
**Discount policy:** <bands and approvals>
**Rollout:** <method>, metric, guardrails, decision date
**Existing customers:** <grandfathering, notice period, message draft>
**Main risk and fallback:** ...

About this skill

Written and maintained by the Claude Skills editors to the same editorial standard as every skill in the directory: a selective trigger, a real workflow, known pitfalls and a verification step. First published , last updated . MIT licensed.

esc